Podcast: Matthias Arnsdorf on a new – and cheaper – KVA
Quant proposes approach anchored by a dealer’s default rate rather than its return on equity
JP Morgan quant proposes an alternative approach, anchored by a dealer’s default rate, rather than its return on equity
Every time a bank executes a derivatives trade there is – in theory – some incremental impact on its regulatory capital requirement, and a cost to shareholders. This cost can be reflected in the spread charged for the trade, known as a capital valuation adjustment, or KVA.
This is a complex calculation, and according to Matthias Arnsdorf – global head of counterparty credit risk quant research at JP Morgan, and our guest for this Quantcast – traditional approaches have made a mistake in anchoring the adjustment to a bank’s return on equity. In a paper published this month on Risk.net, he introduces a quantity that is instead found to be proportional to the default rate of the firm, rather than its ROE.
Arnsdorf derives KVA from first principles. He represents each trade as a transfer of wealth between shareholders and bondholders – so, as the balance between the firm’s equity and bonds varies, the value to the shareholder does as well. The quantity he introduces, KVA2, captures such variation.
The KVA resulting from Arnsdorf’s recipe may be tens of times lower than that calculated with the standard approach. This will be instantly appealing to a lot of dealers, but the idea is in its infancy and its viability is still to be tested.
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Index
00:00 Intro
01:20 What KVA is, and why it matters
05:30 Issues with the standard approach to KVA
11:15 Transfer of wealth between shareholders and bondholders
14:45 Comparison with Kjaer and Andersen’s approaches
19:50 The appetite of banks for KVA2 and potential regulatory reservations
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Banking
Infrequent MtM reduces neither value-at-risk nor backtesting exceptions
Frequency of repricing impacts volatility and correlation measures
SABR convexity adjustment for an arithmetic average RFR swap
A model-independent convexity adjustment for interest rate swaps is introduced
Joint S&P 500/VIX smile calibration in discrete and continuous time
An arbitrage-free model for exotic options that captures smiles and futures is presented
The carbon equivalence principle: minimising the cost to carbon net zero
A method to align incentives with sustainability in financial markets is introduced
Leveraged wrong-way risk
A model to assess the exposure to leveraged and collateralised counterparties is presented
Neural joint S&P 500/VIX smile calibration
A one-factor stochastic local volatility model can solve the joint calibration problem
Pricing the transition of Scope 3 emissions
A framework to measure banks’ costs associated with carbon emissions is proposed
Most read
- Quants are using language models to map what causes what
- Reluctantly, CME moves to clear US Treasuries
- The bank quant who wants to stop gen AI hallucinating