AIFMD segregation power lies with depository banks

Prime brokers forced to comply and change models, says lawyer

quotation-marks
Jacqui Hatfield, partner, Reed Smith

The fact that Esma is forcing segregation of alternative investment fund (AIF) assets from non-AIF assets is not surprising, especially given the AIFMD language requiring the identification of assets of AIFs at the sub-custodian level. The segregation will be welcomed by depositories who have liability for the assets held with sub-custodians, but no effective control over them. Esma is consulting on two options, both of which require segregation of AIF assets

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: