CFTC puts new spin on spoofing cases

Charges may be brought under regulation 166.3 in cases where intent is hard to prove

cftc-hq

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission can charge firms that fail to adequately supervise traders who engage in market manipulation or spoofing even if prosecutors are unable to prove intent.

Rostin Behnam, one of three commissioners at the CFTC, cited a January 2017 case involving Citigroup traders spoofing the US Treasury futures markets, where the bank settled charges of spoofing and failing to adequately supervise its employees – a violation of regulation 166.3. Regulators define

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: