Skip to main content

Rethinking model validation for GenAI governance

A US model risk leader outlines how banks can recalibrate existing supervisory standards

Large, net-style lines of digital data flow into a computer, exiting in more compressed and ordered lines

For more than two decades, model risk management (MRM) has been built on a simple but powerful assumption: given defined inputs, a model produces a stable and repeatable output. Whether validating a value-at-risk engine or an expected credit loss model, validators relied on backtesting, sensitivity analysis and benchmarking against an assumed mathematical ground truth.

Those techniques assume

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here