Trade surveillance should not deter traders

Monitoring costs are forcing commodity players away from market participation, say consultants

surveillance camera

Post-crisis reform has seen regulators in the European Union and the US compel energy and commodity market participants to significantly increase their trade monitoring and reporting capabilities. Broadly, the regulations have been put in place to create more transparent markets and eradicate manipulative behaviour and market abuse. However, because developing internal trade surveillance systems is costly and may be ineffective if done improperly, some market participants have instead avoided

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: