Skip to main content

ALM has no formal role in capital planning at a third of banks

Risk Benchmarking study finds banks split three ways on policy mandates, with G-Sibs as likely as small regionals to assign ALM formal responsibility

This piece is part of a series benchmarking bank ALM practices. Risk Management subscribers can view selected cuts of the underlying data here. Sign up for Risk Benchmarking emails here.

At one in three banks, asset and liability management (ALM) teams currently enjoy no formal role when it comes to helping steer capital planning, Risk Benchmarking research suggests.

Asked to describe their ALM

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

ALM Benchmarking: explore the data

View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here