Cat bond ‘lite’ structures raise contamination risk and insolvency fears

shapes

Experts are divided on the use of segregated accounts companies (SAC) in so-called catastrophe bond ‘lite' transactions, with some suggesting they introduce an increased element of risk compared with more traditional structures.

In a typical cat bond issue, catastrophe risk is transferred from the cedant to the capital markets via a fully collateralised special purpose vehicle (SPV) completely separated from the operations of the ceding (re)insurer. The process is standardised under Rule 144a of

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: