UFR change would ‘threaten’ Solvency II political compromise

German policy-makers talk tough in opposition to lowering of discount rate

Senior industry figures, particularly in Germany, say the Solvency II political balance is under threat

If you focus too much on the economic basis for financial regulation, you can forget how the details often have as much to do with balancing political interests. Arguably the most technical aspects of Solvency II – the matching adjustment (MA), volatility adjustment (VA) and ultimate forward rate (UFR) – are amendments to the directive introduced to appease anxieties specific to national markets.

Broadly speaking, during the 2013 Omnibus II negotiations in the European Parliament, UK

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: