The common drivers behind alt risk premia’s difficult year
Statistical analysis shows four strategies caused most pain, but funds suffered differently
Those who were waiting for the alternative risk premia (ARP) sector to face its first real test got their wish in 2018.
The year was disappointing for the main indexes of both bank products and funds, with performance below the risk-free rate1 in eight months out of 12 and an average Sharpe ratio of –1.2 (see figure 1).
What happened? Here we dig into the data to understand which strategies drove losses industry-wide and to look at how individual funds were exposed.
The results show that
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Asset management
