The common drivers behind alt risk premia’s difficult year

Statistical analysis shows four strategies caused most pain, but funds suffered differently

golden mask

Those who were waiting for the alternative risk premia (ARP) sector to face its first real test got their wish in 2018.

The year was disappointing for the main indexes of both bank products and funds, with performance below the risk-free rate1 in eight months out of 12 and an average Sharpe ratio of –1.2 (see figure 1).

What happened? Here we dig into the data to understand which strategies drove losses industry-wide and to look at how individual funds were exposed.

The results show that

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: