Margin calls, euro clearing and money-market funds


LCH MARGIN CALLS attract scrutiny after Brexit turmoil

EMIR could mean land grab for euro clearing

MONEY MARKET FUNDING dries up for banks


COMMENTARY: New fears of margin calls

The regulatory push towards margining of non-cleared derivatives trades continues, with the spotlight this week falling on Asian markets. International Swaps and Derivatives Association chief executive Scott O'Malia said an "aggressive" implementation timeline for requiring the exchange of initial and variation margin for non-cleared trades would require at least eight months, assuming all went smoothly.

All may not, of course, go smoothly. One area of active debate in many Asian jurisdictions, some of which have yet to release the final text of their rules on margin exchange, is how to handle the issues around non-netting trades – those taking place in jurisdictions where trades cannot be netted out, and collateralisation may not be enforceable. (Asia has many, chief among them being China.) Handling these trades is taxing regulators such as the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, and time may be running out to hit the March 2017 deadline for implementation – the alternative, O'Malia has warned, is a "repapering exercise on a scale that has not been seen before".

And on the other side of the fence, there are now worrying signs the push towards central clearing could have created new systemic risks in times of crisis. LCH is considering reforms after coming under fire for making several large margin calls as markets thrashed around in the wake of the UK's Brexit vote.

Fears are growing that such calls could be pro-cyclical, creating additional funding and liquidity burdens for banks already struggling to cope with a crisis of some kind. The irony that central clearing could be the source of the next contagious crisis has not escaped regulators, and the likely consequence is that LCH and other clearing houses will come under tighter control – official or indirect – by those responsible for financial stability. This won't be a complete surprise, given their newly central role in the world financial system, but it might not be a pleasant change.



Investors have pulled $1 trillion from prime funds since the US Securities and Exchange Commission finalised its money market reforms in July 2014, forcing banks to find alternative sources of short-term funding.



"The trend we have observed in Hong Kong and Singapore is slightly worrying. If a bank is not systemically important for the domestic market, then you shouldn't have to prepare a local recovery and resolution plan, but these resolution laws seem to be introducing the requirement for other banks to conform through the backdoor" – A regulation expert at one European bank active in Asia.



Energy firms fear liquidity void if US capital proposals hit banks
Trades ‘wouldn't be anywhere near making sense' for banks

CCPs defend direct clearing models for the buy side
FCMs unsure if direct margin posting will deliver capital savings

BoE plans could force change to Libor-Sonia swap payments
Reformed Sonia proposals may see floating-leg settlements delayed

EU trading obligation threatens US equivalence

Rigid criteria and poor data could make EU regime too narrow to achieve US recognition

Banks test blockchain potential for real-time market surveillance
Regulators able to monitor a million active trades and hundreds of messages per second in equity swap test

Hidden risks for corporates in renewable energy PPAs
Buyers face load, covariance and basis risks in typical agreements

Wells Fargo pays the price for ‘ghost account' fraud
Megan van Ooyen from SAS rounds up the top five op risk losses for September

StanChart hires Ramambason as head of XVA
Ramambason to lead newly created XVA desk

Position vacant: unpicking energy's hidden contract risks
Complex, long-term supply deals present job opportunity for risk managers

Hedge funds seeking cheap hedges for Italian referendum
Buy side turning to Brexit-inspired hedges for political tail risk

Treating sovereign bonds as risk-free ‘courageous' - Parente
UFR update needed for credibility; too early to change risk margin, Eiopa director tells conference

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here