Margins, OpRisk Europe and the pushback against Basel

The week on, June 10–16, 2016


MARGIN rules to be delayed in EU

OPRISK EUROPE conference told "intervene less"

CAPITAL MODELS need to stay, EBA warns Basel

COMMENTARY: Margining delays and CSAs

Preparations for the start of bilateral margining in the non-cleared swap market were thrown into disarray last week, when the European Commission told reporters the EU's leg of the regime would not take effect on September 1, as planned.

If the US goes ahead with its own rules – issued separately by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the country's prudential regulators – it would create a transatlantic lag of nine months or more, leaving US banks at a competitive disadvantage in the meantime, according to industry figures who testified to the House Committee on Agriculture this week.

News of the postponement broke on June 9 but, as of June 16, there was still no official announcement from the EC on how it planned to implement the framework, leaving the industry relying on the press. was able to shed some light on the matter, revealing that the EU's postponement would affect not just the initial batch of big dealers that were due to start posting and collecting initial margin from September, but also the tens of thousands of market participants that would have been subject to variation margining from March next year. It's understood both deadlines will take effect in May or June, 2017.

One of the big questions now is whether US regulators will reluctantly follow suit. CFTC chairman Timothy Massad has already said the agency plans to stick to its timetable. Prudential regulators have so far declined to comment.

The framework as a whole continues to be criticised by Asian bankers, who deplore the insistence on ‘impossible' next-day settlement standards.

But every cloud has a silver lining, and the arrival of the margining regime has served to revive plans for standardisation of the credit support annexes (CSAs) that govern collateral posting in the swaps market. CSAs already need to be reopened to make them compliant with the new rules, and dealers are hoping many of the existing contracts will be replaced with a less flexible document, helping to reduce the optionality and valuation disputes that currently plague the market. In parallel, swaps clearing house LCH is holding private talks with some dealers about a service that would achieve similar ends.



Mandatory clearing rules pushed 82% of interest rate swap contracts into CCPs as of the end of 2015, up from around 50% in 2008


"The real drag on lending is the legacy non-performing loans – that is the problem. Supervisors need to put pressure on the banks to deal decisively with this issue. At the same time, you need a policy-maker to eliminate the obstacles to this process which come from public policies themselves." EBA chair Andrea Enria



Cyber is just a 'subset of operational risk', CISO says
Information security should use same framework as op risk, Cyber Risk Europe delegates hear

IFRS 9 packs bigger punch than Basel changes, say bankers
Capital hit from new loan loss accounting rules to rival incoming Basel regulations

SEC legal hurdles threaten non-US CDS dealers
Concerns mount over ability of foreign banks to comply with the SEC's security-based swap registration rules

EU energy firms uneasy over inside information proposals
List of information expected or required to be disclosed under the Market Abuse Regulation is 'misleading', say industry groups

UK financial firms lack ‘basic cyber hygiene', says FCA
Financial regulator says it will challenge firms more regularly on cyber security

Basel's Adachi: banks may discard some loss data under SMA
Chair of working group on operational risk says losses from discontinued businesses may not count towards op risk capital

Interview: Natasha Cazenave on systemic risk in asset management
Chair of Iosco's investment management committee welcomes "shift in the debate to an activities focus"

Status quo will push back on blockchain, conference hears
Control, cost, intermediaries and law all seen as hurdles for use of blockchain in financial markets

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: