What Brexit teaches operational risk management
Receptiveness, resilience and reflection are crucial for avoiding nasty surprises
Ariane Chapelle is honorary reader in operational risk at University College London and the director of Chapelle Consulting, a UK-based risk management advisory firm
Like others, my main emotion was one of incredulity on the morning of June 24. The result of the UK's referendum on membership of the European Union was a surprise for most and terrible news for many. In common with The Economist, I believe there is "much to lament" over this outcome, as well as the whole process that led to it. Besides the astonishment and political storm we are still very much feeling today, Brexit has taught me three lessons in risk management that I would like to share.
Receptiveness: don't rule out the unlikely
I never thought Brexit would happen. I trusted the bookies, distrusted the opinion polls and was convinced the old populist arguments for protectionism and curbs on immigration would seduce only a minority. I wasn't alone in being wrong, but I was wrong. I was so convinced of a 'remain' vote that I didn't prepare for it.
One of the companies I work with, a French financial firm, felt similarly. Its risk management department prepared nothing except a vague internal note on Brexit – and only then because it was encouraged to do so by the European Banking Authority. On the morning of June 24 it appeared unprepared, with no contingent communication to offer its clients.
Not everybody was so blind or so careless. At the other end of the spectrum, a UK-based firm I have worked with closely didn't leave anything to chance. The firm, which is active in foreign exchange markets, didn't expect a 'leave' outcome any more than I did, but the chief risk officer and his team made sure to prepare for every possible market scenario, no matter how remote it looked.
The 40 traders and risk managers who spent the evening of June 23 at their desks did not waste their time. Many stayed up for more than 30 hours in a row. What happened exceeded all their expectations, but did not reach their worst-case scenario either, and the firm actually did very well that night.
That firm and its chief risk officer taught me a risk management lesson: don't ever let your personal convictions come in the way of prevention and contingency. Be open-minded and receptive to others' ideas and opinions when preparing for the future, however unlikely or bizarre they might seem. Life is vastly unpredictable, and human minds are particularly ill-equipped at predicting future events, so be humble in your forecasts.
Resilience: management is as important as prevention
Prevention is better than cure, according to common wisdom. For a long time, operational risk management in financial services has focused, sometimes solely, on risk assessment, prevention and internal controls. This can foster overconfidence in the safety of your business, leaving you disarmed and vulnerable when accidents strike. By the bank's own acknowledgment, the damage caused at NatWest by IT breakdowns was as much down to poor incident management as the breakdowns themselves. Similarly, it is public knowledge that the regrettable way BNP Paribas tried to resist the US Department of Justice over historical sanctions violations did not lessen the eventual penalties.
There are many examples of incidents and accidents that were either mitigated or aggravated by efficient or poor crisis management. In 2011, jazz improvisation player Stefon Harris gave an interesting talk at a TED event explaining how many actions are perceived as mistakes only because we don't react to them appropriately. This view from the world of music is also relevant to risk management.
From technological breakthroughs to political changes and regulatory reforms, our increasingly volatile environment forces firms and individuals to be more adaptable, reactive and resilient. The UK education system has also embraced resilience and adaptability: rather than trying to teach our children knowledge that will soon be outdated or that doesn't yet exist, primary and preparatory schools aim to teach the skills of inquisitiveness, curiosity and perseverance. That way, they equip children with the skills to learn and adjust to whatever technology and knowledge they will need in the future.
This idea is just as applicable to organisational resilience. It is pointless to try to guess future incidents and much wiser to learn to adjust to them, so that firms can adapt to whatever comes their way. I know of one UK-based international bank that has launched a risk management theme around resilience: the objective is to reflect upon and improve the resiliency of the firm to whatever major event that may strike, whether it is economic, physical, reputational, or anything else.
Reflection: take time to learn the lessons
Reflection is my third Brexit lesson. Brexit should encourage risk managers to reflect on their past mistakes and successes to get the most out of their experiences. There is much to learn from Brexit and not only from a political standpoint. How we, as risk managers and professionals, have prepared for it – or not – is rich with teachings.
As part of their operational risk management framework, some firms have a 'lessons learnt' element. This consists of the action plans and other transformations determined following a large incident, or a significant near-miss.
'Lessons learnt' is more explicit and therefore a more advisable wording than the classic 'action plan'. It highlights the need for reflection before the need for action. In a fast-moving world it is difficult, but important, to take the time for reflection. Too few of us do it, so it also confers an interesting competitive advantage.
So what did I learn from Brexit? I learnt that, even if we must be aware of our environment, our exposure and our vulnerabilities, only fools can pretend to know what the future holds. We must be humble about our capacity to foresee the future and to anticipate disruptive changes. By definition, no-one can see what is 'around the corner'. To me, even with a set date and tight polls, Brexit was 'around the corner'. I would have bet confidently that it wouldn't happen. Then it did. My convictions made me blind.
We all have blind spots. Being aware of them is a first step. To accept and prepare for a seemingly impossible event is better. And because the future is so hard to predict and risk is so difficult to assess, the resilience of firms and individuals to change is a skill that needs to be further developed, both in schools and the financial sector. Finally, reflecting on our mistakes and successes in relation to Brexit, or any other significant event, will help us to adapt and adjust to the next one.
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら リスク管理
リスク管理担当者は、イントラデイ・レポ取引に伴うリスクとメリットに頭を悩ませている
担保の流通速度の上昇や再利用の増加が見込まれることも、市場におけるレバレッジやリスクを高める可能性があります
オペリスク・データ:日本のレストラン向け決済企業が7億ドルの損失を計上
また、バローダ銀行の詐欺事件の提訴、ウェルズ・ファーゴのポンジ・スキーム問題、そしてスウェドバンクのパナマ文書関連の賠償金支払いについても取り上げます。データ提供:ORX News
レポ・トークンは清算されない...のか?
トークン化された米国債の清算状況については依然として不透明感が残っており、決定はDTCCに委ねられる見通しです
ECB、地政学的ストレステストの枠組みに不備を指摘
現在の手法では、地政学的緊張が流動性に及ぼす影響を適切に把握できていません
内部報告データがガバナンスとリスク管理をいかにして強化できるか
日本の改正された内部通報制度は、社内通報体制を強化する機会となります
高速レポ取引により、より低コストで迅速な取引への期待が高まる
DTCCが試験導入しているトークン化国債は、決済サイクルを短縮し、24時間365日のレポ取引を可能にする可能性があります
FCMたちは、CMEの監督からの離脱を認めるCFTCの提案を支持している
新たな規則は、垂直統合型取引所グループにおける利益相反に対処することを目的としています
トークン関連のコストという大波が押し寄せようとしている
トークンの利用が急増していることから、金融企業は現代のエンタープライズAIの経済性を再考せざるを得なくなっています