メインコンテンツに移動

Regulators struggle to tackle pro-cyclicality

Mitigating pro-cyclicality in the regulatory capital framework was one of the principal objectives of Basel III, but serious concerns surround the counter-cyclical capital buffer proposal, while efforts to dampen cyclicality in minimum requirements appear to have stalled. How much progress have regulators actually made? Joel Clark reports

simon-hills-bba-0809

Of the various components that make up the Basel III reform package, few have been more complex or challenging than efforts to mitigate pro-cyclicality. With the reforms due to be finalised by the end of the year, few regulators or bankers have the confidence to assert that the approach adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision will genuinely succeed in reducing the cyclicality of the

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

無料メンバーシップの内容をお知りになりたいですか?ここをクリック

パスワードを表示
パスワードを非表示にする

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here