メインコンテンツに移動

Lessons in liquidity II

Following the interview with the Monetary Authority of Singapore on the critical issue of liquidity risk management in the July issue, this month the spotlight falls on the Sydney-based Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority. By Christopher Jeffery

asiarisk-aug08-21-gif

Asia Risk: Should liquidity risk be explicitly included in regulatory capital - that is, brought explicitly into the Basel II framework?

Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority: The Basel Committee and most national regulators, including the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (Apra), have previously issued guidance and requirements for liquidity risk management, which are still valid

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here