メインコンテンツに移動

The point of op risk

The inclusion of an explicit operational risk component in the proposed Basel II Capital Accord has caused widespread controversy. Much of this has surrounded the feasibility of accurately measuring, or even defining, such risk. In this first of three columns, David Rowe argues that a more important goal should be to improve the consistency of banks’ internal process execution

analysis-1-gif
More than 50 years ago, following their country’s defeat in World War II, some forward-looking Japanese business leaders sought ways to boost the country’s economic recovery. In their search to achieve a competitive edge, they believed improved product quality was a key requirement. At the time, to put it bluntly, ‘Made in Japan’ was a joke, synonymous with cheap products and shoddy workmanship

コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。

これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

ログイン
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here