Microsoft drops stock option compensation
US software company Microsoft has broken ranks with other leading technology providers by announcing its intention to end employee compensation using stock options.
“We want to attract and retain employees by offering real ownership and great long-term financial incentives,” said Steve Balmer, Microsoft’s chief executive. “And we want to ensure that our senior employees’ total compensation is even more closely linked to growth in the number and satisfaction of our customers.”
Microsoft’s move flies in the face of other leading technology providers, such as Sun Microsystems and Apple, which have robustly defended the role of option-based compensation. These companies have fought proposals to change accounting standards to require that stock options be treated as an expense and fair-valued.
“We agree with others in our industry that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to equity compensation programmes and the resultant accounting for them,” commented John Connors, Microsoft’s chief financial officer. “Every company has a unique set of circumstances and this is the appropriate accounting treatment for our new compensation plan.”
Investor demand for options to be accounted for as expenses got a boost last year when rating agency Standard & Poor’s began factoring in stock option expenses to determine core earnings. This, together with political pressure following US corporate accounting scandals, and moves by UK-based accounting standards setter the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to make treating stock options as an expense a requirement, led many US companies to voluntarily adopt the practice. Coca-Cola, Ford Motor Company and General Electric are just some of the companies that now treat employee stock options as an expense.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Basel war on window-dressing may smooth liquidity, at a price
Changes to G-Sib charge could curb year-end repo volatility, but also cut balance sheet capacity
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Most read
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one