Internal model approval – supervisors' different approaches

Last month’s Life & Pension Risk reported on how European regulators are dealing with the internal model approval process. In this month’s follow-up, Clive Davidson reports on how supervisors are dealing with ‘cherry picking’ and proportionality

cherry

The aim of Solvency II is to create a consistent risk-based regulatory regime across all European Union member states. Insurers have the option of creating internal models to measure their risk and hence determine their regulatory capital. However, the insurance markets within member countries differ widely, as does the degree of sophistication among the insurers themselves. Therefore, it is not surprising that when it comes to internal model approval by regulators there is some difference in

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here