BCBS finally issues its principles for sound liquidity risk management for public consultation
BASEL – The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has issued for public comment enhanced global Principles for Sound Liquidity Risk Management and Supervision. The principles support one of the key recommendations for strengthening prudential oversight set out in the Report of the Financial Stability Forum on Enhancing Market and Institutional Resilience, which was presented to G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2008.
“The Basel Committee’s goal in developing these global standards is to significantly raise the bar for the management and supervision of liquidity risk at banks,” said Nout Wellink, chairman of the Basel Committee and president of the Netherlands Bank. “The Committee fully expects banks and supervisors to implement the enhanced principles promptly and thoroughly. We will vigorously assess the degree to which the principles are implemented.”
The draft principles represent a substantial revision of the Committee’s liquidity guidance that was published in 2000 and reflect the lessons of the financial market turmoil. The work is intended to strengthen banks' liquidity risk management and improve global supervisory practices. The principles underscore the importance of establishing a robust liquidity risk management framework that is well integrated into the bank-wide risk management process. The primary objective of this guidance is to raise banks’ resilience to liquidity stress.
Among other things, the principles seek to raise standards in the following areas:
• Governance and the articulation of a firm-wide liquidity risk tolerance;
• Liquidity risk measurement, including the capture of off-balancesheet exposures, securitisation activities, and other contingent liquidity risks that were not well managed during the financial market turmoil;• Aligning the risk-taking incentives of individual business units with the liquidity risk exposures their activities create for the bank;
• Stress tests that cover a variety of institution-specific and market-wide scenarios, with a link to the development of effective contingency funding plans;
• Strong management of intra-day liquidity risks and collateral positions;
• Maintenance of a robust cushion of unencumbered, high-quality liquid assets to be in a position to survive protracted periods of liquidity stress; and
• Regular public disclosures, both quantitative and qualitative, of a bank’s liquidity risk profile and management.
The principles also strengthen expectations about the role of supervisors, including the need to intervene in a timely manner to address deficiencies and the importance of communication with other supervisors and public authorities, both within and across national borders.
The proposed guidance focuses on liquidity risk management at medium and large complex banks, but the sound principles have broad applicability to all types of banks. Other factors that a bank and its supervisors should consider include the bank’s role and systemic importance in the financial sectors of the jurisdictions in which it operates.
Comments are invited by July 29, 2008.
More on Market Risk
Hedging threatened by treatment of liquidity and diversification, critics claim
Risk Awards 2015: Teamwork allowed bank to cut VAR by $30 million in three days
Risk Awards 2015: Critics challenged to look at the data by fund branded ‘not rateable’
Sponsored video: MSCI
Sign up for Risk.net email alerts
Oxford professor David Vines argues that the carrot is as important as the stick
Sponsored webinar: IBM
Watch highlights of this year's London conference
Operational risk and the challenges of defining and dealing with conduct risk
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.