Op risk expenditure to shoot up, predicts report
Expenditure on operational risk technology systems will rise to $8.2 billion by 2007 from the current level of $5.2 billion, according to research published by Towergroup, the Massachusetts-based technology consultants.
The report estimates that 30% of IT spending associated with compliance in the financial services industry consists of wasteful duplication - which TowerGroup said equates to $10 billion globally in IT waste alone - with big companies spread across disparate product lines the worst effected. It further claims that 40% of the $10 billion waste relates to investments in IT, where the benefits that could be spread throughout an organisation are instead implemented in silos, limiting the impact of the system to one product line or geographical unit.
The consultants estimate compliance waste will increase by 25% over the next five years unless financial institutions view regulatory compliance and IT spending on a holistic, enterprise-wide basis. In addition, it said firms should utilise the broad range of technology systems that serve a broader business purpose than merely supporting enterprise risk management.
Financial institutions should welcome Basel II for inspiring an enterprise risk management culture throughout the organisation, said Virginia Garcia, the report’s author. Institutions would be shortsighted to do just enough to meet regulatory requirements, she adds. “There is an urgency to adopt a risk culture that arms firms with the information they need to increase shareholder value.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
What futures and options say about the cost of war
Spot prices reveal major disruption, futures indicate this will pass, options imply ongoing instability
CME-FICC cross-netting terms fuel clashes
Hedge funds worried by CCP powers to suspend arrangement; clearing members say it’s standard practice
For collateral, can TINA become TIA?
US Treasuries’ dominance as collateral in repo and derivatives is no longer set in stone, argues economist
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
Op risk data: HK gets tough on takeover in $200m takedown
Also: Bank staff steal state funds in India; Vanguard settles US net zero lawsuit. Data by ORX News
CRO view: Emerging risks in the age of AI
The risk agenda is shifting beyond market and credit volatility towards operational resilience, AI governance and culture
Interest rate crosswinds buffet IRRBB teams
Political intervention and rapid-fire law changes are skewering bank models for forecasting cashflows
FRTB internal models: quo vadis?
Two risk experts explore how to adjust the FRTB framework to promote internal model usage