House of Lords criticises statistical models for op risk management
Government report throws doubt on the validity of modelling operational risk
LONDON - A report published on June 2 on banking regulation and supervision by the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee has cautioned supervisors about relying on statistical models alone for measuring operational risk exposure.
The report is largely a critique of the UK's tripartite regulatory regime but a reference to the flaws inherent in modelling operational risk is also buried within it, which has shocked some in the industry. "It's very odd for it to appear in that report," says one source. "It is frustrating also because even though it is very critical of op risk modelling, it doesn't suggest any alternative."
The report reads: "It is not clear that modelling techniques developed to manage portfolios of liquid financial instruments are well-suited to the management of operational risk." Two witnesses are also quoted in the report. One, Jon Danielsson, a reader in finance at the London School of Economics, who provide an oral testimony to the committee, is quoted as saying "operational risk modelling is very dangerous", while William Perraudin, chair of finance at Imperial College, London states "modelling operational risk and setting capital is in some ways hard to justify." However Perraudin also said charging capital against operational risk might generate the right incentives within firms.
The overall recommendation from the report on modelling operational risk is that "in general, financial models designed for use in liquid markets should not be used in the supervision of illiquid markets" but it does not go on to suggest an alternative method of measuring operational risk. It concludes: "Supervisors should base their assessments of operational risk upon a close understanding of the banks they regulate, and not upon statistical models, which cannot substitute for judgement based on analysis." This is what supervisors have been doing under the Capital Requirements Directive anyway since it was implemented, which suggests the report is either seeking to reiterate the importance of supervisors' judgement or sending a message to banks that have placed too much emphasis on modelling operational risk to the detriment of operational risk management.
This story will be covered in more depth in the July issue of OpRisk & Compliance. If you have any comments to make about this please contact Victoria.pennington@incisivemedia.com.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
FICC takes flak over Treasury clearing proposal
Latest plans would still allow members to bundle clearing and execution – and would fail to boost clearing capacity, critics say
Buy side would welcome more guidance on managing margin calls
FSB report calls for regulators to review existing standards for non-bank liquidity management
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Benchmark switch leaves hedging headache for Philippine banks
If interest rates are cut before new benchmark docs are ready, banks face possible NII squeeze
Op risk data: Tech glitch gives customers unlimited funds
Also: Payback for slow Paycheck Protection payouts; SEC hits out at AI washing. Data by ORX News
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Top 10 op risks: change brings challenges
Higher interest margins and a trend toward insourcing drive major tech projects