Cutting Edge introduction: Creative stress testing
Quants and decision-makers are often different people – which is all the more obvious in stress testing, where a decision maker’s subjective views on the market have to be able to endure the mathematical rigour of the exercise. Thanks to a new technique, neither party has to compromise.
Despite the growing importance of stress-testing exercises, such as those applied by regulators to European and US banks, or those used to set clearing house default fund sizes, stress-testing methodology in itself has not changed much in the last 20 years.
"Scenario analysis and stress testing, from a purely statistical point of view, is predicated on the assumption that in some funky, complicated way the future looks like the past. But say Greece defaults or leaves the EU tomorrow – we do not have one such instance in the historical past. So how do we say something meaningful about something extremely relevant without having to rely in a slavish manner on what is happening in the past?" says the head of research at a large asset management firm in London.
This month's first technical, Stress testing in non-normal markets via entropy pooling, by Attilio Meucci, chief risk officer at investment management firm KKR in New York, and David Ardia, an assistant professor of finance in Laval University in Québec, offers one answer.
"Typically, risk managers specify one scenario – or joint scenarios – for a couple of risk factors, then run their models and look at the impact on expected profit and loss under simple assumptions like the normal distribution," says Meucci.
The process is tedious and mechanical and churns out one output number per scenario. In addition, the types of market views that can be incorporated are limited to expectations on measures such as return and price.
The authors believe it is possible to do better than that. The two quants develop a stress-testing method that is able to not only include flexible views on the market – on rankings, inequalities, correlations, tail risk and skewness, for example, while working with non-normal distributions - but that can also output whole distributions instead of a single profit-or-loss value like in traditional methods.
What allows this is a technique Meucci developed in 2008 called entropy pooling, the latest version of which can incorporate non-normal distributions and flexible investor views in both portfolio and risk management.
Entropy pooling, like the more popular Bayesian techniques, takes in an arbitrary market distribution, called the prior, and investors' views on the market, and generates a posterior distribution by minimising the relative entropy – a measure of the difference between two distributions. The result is a posterior distribution consistent with both market data and investors' views.
"Typically, the views are based on expectations, but here you can have views on any feature like value-at-risk, for example – you can really get creative with your views," says Meucci.
Applying this to stress testing, the prior becomes the assumed distribution of a measure the risk manager is interested in – such as the profit and loss (P&L) – and the scenarios form the views. The posterior, in this case, is the stressed P&L distribution.
With flexible views, using the brute force method for the stress test is computationally demanding, but the authors apply a copula marginal decomposition – representing dependence between distributions of different variables – to decompose the relative entropy so it is easier to compute in the presence of flexible views.
The advantage to all this is being able to link intuitive views to a mathematically rigorous stress test.
"Very often, the users of stress testing will not be well-versed in quantitative methods, so they want something that is intuitive. They want something akin to what the decision-maker understands and can make a call about, not something like ‘what if we had doubled the frequency in the Fourier expansion? '. So it is very much a matter of language. And it is very important that the vocabulary used by different approaches is the vocabulary understood by the decision-makers," says the head of research at the asset management firm.
While entropy pooling may not be widely used in stress testing today, it is understood one regulator is actively looking at the benefits of Bayesian approaches – which may be the start of a wider move away from purely historical and statistical methods.
In our second technical, Scaling operational loss data and its systemic risk implications, Roberto Torresetti and Claudio Nordio, both senior quantitative risk analysts in the risk management division of Banca Carige in Genova, show how external operational risk data – required by regulators to capture tail risk – needs to be adequately scaled to ensure the accuracy of a bank's own capital charge.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FICC takes flak over Treasury clearing proposal
Latest plans would still allow members to bundle clearing and execution – and would fail to boost clearing capacity, critics say
Buy side would welcome more guidance on managing margin calls
FSB report calls for regulators to review existing standards for non-bank liquidity management
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Benchmark switch leaves hedging headache for Philippine banks
If interest rates are cut before new benchmark docs are ready, banks face possible NII squeeze
Op risk data: Tech glitch gives customers unlimited funds
Also: Payback for slow Paycheck Protection payouts; SEC hits out at AI washing. Data by ORX News
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies