CCP basis and the future of cleared swap pricing
Dealers predict "more granular" pricing for cleared trades, after CME-LCH basis blow-out
The lifecycle of a trade is often split into two hemispheres. There are things that happen prior to the trade being executed – quote requests, the communication of bids and offers, credit checks and so on – and things that happen afterwards.
Clearing is one of the many things that belong in this post-trade world, so an outsider looking in at the swap market might find it odd that an otherwise-identical transaction would vary in price depending on a customer's choice of clearing venue. The pre-trade and post-trade worlds are somehow bleeding into each other, they might think – the walls between them twisting into a Möbius strip.
To an insider, there's nothing strange about this. It might make sense to think about pre- and post-trade separately from an operational or regulatory point of view, but in terms of the economics, the choice of clearing house will determine how much margin the bank has to stump up and what kind of collateral is acceptable. That should be reflected in the price.
Traders learned these lessons in 2009 and 2010, when collateral agreements on bilateral trades first started to determine the swap discount rate, and introduced the market to a brand new form of arbitrage (Risk June 2013). They were reinforced in 2012 and 2013, when banks started to upfront the funding costs arising when an uncollateralised trade is hedged with a collateralised one, in the form of the funding valuation adjustment (FVA).
So it shouldn't be a surprise that – if a product can be cleared at two central counterparties (CCPs), and one of them has a directional book of trades - dealers would seek compensation for the margin costs associated with new risk-additive trades. In fact, it's more surprising that the basis between CME Group and LCH.Clearnet was not being priced in far earlier – if that had been the case, its eventual surge in May would not have been so dramatic.
For any given trade that could clear at more than one CCP, a dealer will have a preferred choice
The more divisive question is how far to take it. For any given trade that could clear at more than one CCP, a dealer will have a preferred choice – the one at which the trade will be most risk-reducing, least risk-additive, or cheapest for that specific bank to fund. In theory, the price might be shaded to reflect that. The basis, then, might not be a single figure that applies across the Street to all trades of a given type. It might be dealer- rather than CCP-specific.
This kind of development is hinted at by two traders in this month's lead stories. One says banks will have to deal with CCP basis by pricing some trades "in a more granular way relative to what we have currently". The second warns a basis could pop up for any product cleared at two different CCPs, then adds: "There should be one in theory, because no-one will ever have the same position between two clearing houses."
In other words, cleared swap trades might not be immune to the kind of pricing diversity that now afflicts the bilateral market.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Markets
Barclays disputes CDS committee decision ahead of auction
Representing the bank, law firm Milbank argues the committee’s approach risks constraining the market and goes against expectations
How Risk.net’s robots unlocked Ucits trade data
Machine learning tool helps reveal the largest European derivatives users – and who they trade with
Pricing and funding woes hit gilt repo
QT-driven funding cost rises combined with clients’ price demands see at least two banks pull back
China set to extend NDF trading scheme for onshore banks
CFETS expected to introduce RFQ functionality and more currencies for non-deliverable forwards
New data reveals Pimco is top Ucits interest rate swaps user
Counterparty Radar: US managers and dealers reign supreme in European retail fund space
Goldman appoints new financial risk head
Promotion sees Josh Schiffrin oversee strategy and financial risk, including trading supervision
Another post-Libor rate aims to clear Iosco bar
After two rivals were slapped down by the benchmark overseer last year, will Axi fare differently?
Crypto options need more principal market-makers – GS trader
Absence of risk warehousing market-makers holding back options development, says GS crypto trader