How to mend the Libor process

Barclays’ settlement of Libor-rigging claims has sparked a full-scale financial scandal and exposed the conflicts inherent in the rate-setting process. There is a better way to organise it, says David Rowe

david-rowe

Perhaps the first point to make about the Libor rigging scandal is that concerns about the Libor determination process are not new. There was a flurry of interest in the topic when Libor diverged so dramatically from other benchmark rates in 2008 – but as long ago as 1998, observers had warned that the polling process used to set Libor was susceptible to misreporting, whether intentional or accidental.1

Those familiar with the process have always recognised Libor is not based on actual

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here