Isda AGM: clearing regionalisation comes with costs, warn Shirvani and O'Connor
Outgoing and incoming Isda chairs warn multiple CCPs with divergent standards will threaten market liquidity
The liquidity of over-the-counter derivatives markets could suffer if central counterparties (CCPs) continue to multiply and are allowed to operate under different regimes from one country or region to the next, attendees at the International Swaps and Derivatives Asssociation's annual meeting were told this morning.
Delivering one of the opening addresses, the outgoing chair, Eraj Shirvani – who heads the fixed-income business for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at Credit Suisse in London – congratulated the industry on its post-crisis progress, but warned it must not rest on its laurels.
"We need to ensure we achieve the goal of building a more robust regulatory framework and a stronger financial system. To that end, we should avoid fragmentation of central clearing," Shirvani said. "A disparity in standards, policies and processes for clearers would have negative side-effects – the regionalisation of clearing could reduce liquidity."
Those comments were echoed in a press briefing by the incoming Isda chair, Stephen O'Connor, the global head of over-the-counter client clearing at Morgan Stanley. "The academic literature says the best thing for the market is to have one global CCP per asset class because of the associated netting benefits. But that's the ivory tower point of view and we're in the real world, where there are different forces at work. There will be fragmentation, because local regulators have a view on this and we have to work with them."
The Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions are drawing up a set of global standards, but – as Morgan Stanley's O'Connor acknowledged – fragmentation already appears unavoidable. In addition to CCPs with global pretensions, a host of would-be CCPs are setting up with the goal of serving national or regional markets, often with the tacit backing of local regulators – and international dealers are worried this tacit support could translate into explicit requirements for local market participants to use the local CCP.
We need to ensure we achieve the goal of building a more robust regulatory framework and a stronger financial system. To that end, we should avoid fragmentation of central clearing
During the press briefing, Credit Suisse's Shirvani was blunt about the impact, admitting the industry faces increased costs as a result. "If you have several CCPs per asset class per region, it becomes difficult to manage – suddenly you have to connect to 15 CCPs, each with its own risk waterfall and default fund," he said.
The rest of Shirvani's address to the conference was valedictory. He praised the market for its role in managing risk and lauded the industry for the changes made so far, ticking off a series of industry achievements: the fact more than 40% of interest rate swaps are now centrally cleared, along with $16 trillion notional of credit default swaps; a market-wide reduction of $200 trillion notional through portfolio compression; and "vastly improved" transparency for regulators thanks to the creation of data repositories.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage