Sigtarp report criticises New York Fed
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York crippled its own attempts to negotiate haircuts with American International Group's (AIG) credit default swap (CDS) counterparties late last year, effectively turning the AIG rescue into a backdoor bailout of several major banks, according to a US government report published on November 17.
Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the US Troubled Asset Relief Program (Sigtarp), blamed New York Fed president, Timothy Geithner (now Treasury secretary) for failing to negotiate aggressively with AIG's counterparties in November 2008. The New York Fed decided to treat all major counterparties equally - effectively giving a veto over haircuts to any of the counterparties.
Foreign banks such as Société Générale and Calyon were legally prevented from agreeing to voluntary haircuts and less vulnerable to suasion from the Fed and other US regulators. However, the Fed should have been ready to offer different terms to US banks, Barofsky said, especially since many had already received billions of dollars of aid from the US government, and should have used its leverage as their primary regulator to encourage them to accept haircuts. As it was, the Fed ended up with "a negotiating strategy with the counterparties that even then-FRBNY president Geithner acknowledged had little likelihood of success", Barofsky wrote.
In its response to the report, the New York Fed said that "it would not have been appropriate to use our supervisory authority to obtain concessions", especially if this meant treating foreign banks more generously than US banks. The government's existing commitment to saving AIG left the Fed with very little negotiating leverage with the counterparties, it added.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack