Asic takes over regulation of exchange trading
The Australian government has ended self-regulation of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), making the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) responsible for supervising trading on Australian stock markets from the third quarter of 2010.
Asic will take over responsibility from ASX and the independent Disciplinary Tribunal. ASX, however, will keep the authority for the supervision of companies listed on the licensed financial markets.
"Asic is now closer to the market, more accessible, flexible and able to take emerging trends into account more quickly," said Tony D'Aloisio, Asic's chairman, when explaining Asic's suitability for the role.
The change will see Asic working with ASX and industry bodies such as the Australian Financial Markets Association and the Securities and Derivatives Industry Association. A more detailed explanation of the execution of this switch will be provided once the legislative framework is in place, the Australian Treasury added.
The new mechanism will put ASX on a more equal regulatory footing with its aspiring rivals. Three companies have applied for licences to trade in the Australian market. The Axe consortium is backed by the New Zealand NZX exchange, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs JB Were, Macquarie and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, along with Australian brokers CommSec. US marketplace Liquidnet and European trading platform Chi-X have also applied.
See also: Australia lifts ban on short selling
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack