Asic takes over regulation of exchange trading
The Australian government has ended self-regulation of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), making the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) responsible for supervising trading on Australian stock markets from the third quarter of 2010.
Asic will take over responsibility from ASX and the independent Disciplinary Tribunal. ASX, however, will keep the authority for the supervision of companies listed on the licensed financial markets.
"Asic is now closer to the market, more accessible, flexible and able to take emerging trends into account more quickly," said Tony D'Aloisio, Asic's chairman, when explaining Asic's suitability for the role.
The change will see Asic working with ASX and industry bodies such as the Australian Financial Markets Association and the Securities and Derivatives Industry Association. A more detailed explanation of the execution of this switch will be provided once the legislative framework is in place, the Australian Treasury added.
The new mechanism will put ASX on a more equal regulatory footing with its aspiring rivals. Three companies have applied for licences to trade in the Australian market. The Axe consortium is backed by the New Zealand NZX exchange, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs JB Were, Macquarie and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, along with Australian brokers CommSec. US marketplace Liquidnet and European trading platform Chi-X have also applied.
See also: Australia lifts ban on short selling
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion