Cesr proposes Europe-wide disclosure of short positions
Investors across Europe could be compelled to reveal short positions in any stock, under draft rules published today by the Committee of European Securities Regulators (Cesr).
The Committee proposed in a consultation paper today that short positions equivalent to 0.1% of the company be reported to national regulators, and positions of 0.5% be revealed to the market at large. Changes of more than 0.1% in net short positions should also be reported. The rules would cover short exposure through derivatives holdings as well as cash short positions, but would not cover market-making activity. Cesr did not suggest any limits on short selling, saying it had "prioritised" the disclosure rule and would continue to consider bans and price limits in future.
The new rules, unlike many of the temporary short-selling bans instigated by regulators in 2008, would cover all stocks, not just financial stocks. Cesr argued the next market turbulence could occur in any sector, and that if short-selling disclosure was a good idea for banks it must be a good idea for any stock. It added there was some evidence banning shorting of banks in 2008 had displaced shorting activity to other related sectors such as construction, making them even more volatile.
Regulators around the world imposed limits on short selling last year to restrain the plunging prices of financial stocks. The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hurried out short-selling bans on September 18 and 19 respectively, with other national regulators following suit. In fact, one study suggested, banning short selling simply made financial stocks even more volatile.
Already this year, international bodies such as Cesr and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (Iosco) have attempted to bring the various national regimes into line. Iosco called in April for a single set of principles to make compliance easier and prevent regulatory arbitrage. Today's Cesr proposal follows the FSA's lead in proposing a 0.5% net limit for public disclosure.
Many regulators, including the SEC, are considering permanent bans or restrictions on short selling, including bans on naked shorting, uptick rules that only permit shorting when the stock price is rising, and circuit-breakers, which block shorting once a stock has fallen more than a set amount. Such restrictions should be necessary as temporary emergency measures, Cesr said, adding it was looking into whether individual regulators had the power to impose them.
See also: FSA extends short-selling disclosure requirement again
Regulators review short-selling restrictions
SEC roundtable: circuit breakers most favoured short-selling rule
Short-selling ban increased volatility more than credit crisis
The short story
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura