Congress questions SEC competence as Madoff investigation begins
US Congressmen have voiced scepticism about the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) plans to investigate internal failings over the Bernard Madoff fraud case and explore whether numerous opportunities to identify the $50 billion swindle were missed.
Testifying before a the House Committee on Financial Services on January 5, SEC inspector-general David Kotz revealed an official investigation was opened on December 16 into "allegations made to the SEC regarding Mr Madoff going back to at least 1999 and the reasons these allegations were found not to be credible".
In an occasionally tetchy hearing, congressmen appeared frustrated by Kotz's inability to answer questions over the veracity of allegations that the Commission failed to follow up on as many as 29 tip-offs about Madoff's potentially fraudulent activity. Kotz replied that the investigation into the matter is barely under way.
"Madoff's firm was unusual in that it performed custodian, trade clearing and statement-generation functions in addition to managing client funds. When the key regulator is totally asleep while whistleblowers are trying to alert them, as it was with this case, why weren't there checks and balances to alert other regulators?" asked Representative Carolyn Maloney.
"It's pretty pathetic when whistleblowers issue warnings and when [a regulated firm] has an investment system that they won't explain to anyone, and an auditor no one has ever heard of, that this isn't raising concerns with the regulator," she added.
Under the plans laid out by Kotz, the investigation will "trace the path of these complaints through the Commission reviewing what, if any, investigative or other work was conducted with respect to the allegations".
Additionally, conflicts of interest between SEC officials and members of the Madoff family, the extent to which Madoff's public reputation affected investigations of his activities and whether the investigations that did take place missed red flags that could have uncovered the fraud, will also be areas of focus.
Kotz's assurances that the investigation would be "independent and as hard-hitting as necessary" did little to impress congressional leaders, who speculated that the inexperience of young SEC attorneys might have contributed to the failure of several SEC investigations into Madoff to turn up evidence of wrongdoing. One congressman suggested that the market participants that identified Madoff's purported "split strike conversion" strategy as a fallacy would be better equipped to spot future market abuses than career SEC investigators.
See also: Madoff fraud puts focus on due diligence
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- Market for ‘orphan’ hedges leaves some borrowers stranded