China releases derivatives guidelines
China’s banking regulator has finally published its long-awaited derivatives guidelines, bringing to an end 18-months of stop-start consultations with the banking sector and removing some of the legal uncertainties that have plagued the country’s derivatives market.
Under the new guidelines – first mooted as a draft consultation document in July 2002, before disappearing from view until last October, when new draft guidelines were published – financial institutions will be able to trade foreign currency-denominated interest rate, credit and currency derivatives on behalf of clients and on their own account once they have received approval from the country’s regulator, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC).
In a change from the October draft guidelines, the finalised regulations stipulate that financial institutions can use their own assets to conduct ‘profit-oriented’ transactions, an inclusion which will radically change the scope of the Chinese derivatives market. Under the current regulatory framework, derivatives transactions can only be used for hedging and cannot be used for speculative purposes, a rule that has been in place since 1995. In last October’s draft, this was changed to allow banks to conduct ‘arbitrage-like’ transactions, a phrase felt to be too narrow by some observers.
“The fact that it talks of profit-oriented is better than arbitrage, because with arbitrage, it could be interpreted that banks are still not able to take any market risk,” says Chin-Chong Liew, a partner at law firm Allen & Overy in Hong Kong. “Now it’s profit-oriented it seems to indicate that so long as your purpose is to make profits, then you should be able to take market risk.”
Elsewhere, the regulations confirm risk management and personnel requirements outlined in the previous drafts. Licensed institutions must have sound risk management and internal control systems, along with an accounting system for derivatives transactions. In addition, the dealer must ensure the derivatives product is suitable for that client, does not exceed its risk appetite and meets its objectives. In a change from the October draft, however, the final document elaborates on what information that bank needs in order to fulfil its due diligence obligations.
While the new rules come into effect next month, there is a six-month transition period during which financial institutions can apply for licences. “Until the end of that six-month period, life goes on as normal and you can rely on existing rules,” adds Liew.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure