FASB votes to review stock-based compensation standards
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) yesterday voted to review its standards on treating the cost of employee stock options as an expense. The move follows the submission of almost 300 industry comments on the issue.
“A move to require an expense treatment would be consistent with the FASB’s commitment to work towards convergence between US and international accounting standards,” said Robert Herz, FASB chairman. “In taking all these factors into consideration, the Board concluded that it was critical that it now revisit this important subject.”
Investors’ demand for options to be accounted for as expenses got a boost last year when rating agency Standard & Poor’s began factoring in stock option grant expenses to determine core earnings. This, together with political pressure on the back of US corporate accounting scandals, and moves by UK-based accounting standards setter the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to make treating stock options as an expense a requirement, led many US companies to voluntarily adopt the practice. Coca-Cola, Ford Motor Company and General Electric are just some of the companies that now treat employee stock options as an expense.
FASB first proposed that companies be required to recognise stock-based compensation in the income statement using a ‘fair value’ method in the mid 1990s. But it subsequently backed down in the face of strong opposition and allowed the continued use of the ‘intrinsic’ approach to valuation, which is regarded as something of a whitewash because it generally gives a compensation cost of zero.
In November, the FASB asked for comments on whether it should review its current guidelines, contained in Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, and its Related Interpretations. The deadline for comments was reached last month, with 293 responses.
The IASB proposes mandatory treatment of employee stock options as an expense using the fair-value approach. European Union companies are set to adopt the practice in 2005.
US senator Carl Levin (Democrat, Michigan), who has been advocating stock option accounting reform for the past 10 years, welcomed the vote. “Corporate scandals have shown how current US accounting rules are fuelling stock option abuses linked to excessive executive pay, dishonest accounting, and nonpayment of taxes by profitable corporations,” he said. “FASB made the right decision today. Stock options are the 800-pound gorilla that has yet to be caged by corporate reform.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy
EU banks fear loss of NSFR repo relief
European Commission must decide by next June; other jurisdictions adopted softer calibration
Running the numbers on Barr’s Basel III endgame revisions
Fed vice-chair’s plan to ease capital requirements for big banks still lacks critical details
Endgame manoeuvre: US banks put SLR reform back in spotlight
Plan to ease Basel III brings renewed focus to impact of leverage ratio on US Treasury market
Regulators want to fix AT1s. Investors want restraint
Tweaking the instrument that regulators love to hate may be the only way to prevent its abolition
More disclosure touted to temper pre-hedging ills
Transparency could help investors choose a dealer, but will they use the disclosures?
Fed’s Basel III rollback gives clearing units a capital break
Client-cleared trades will be exempt from CVA charges and G-Sib surcharge calculations, says Barr