Natexis hit by heavy equity derivatives losses
French bank Natexis Banques Populaires has made significant losses from its equity derivatives trading business due to poor risk control and failures in the bank’s valuation models.
The French bank said the revaluation of its short- and medium-term derivatives positions would “carve a large slice” out of its capital markets group profits for the second half. “We’ve heard that they [Natexis] may have lost as much as €30 million from exotic option positions,” said a dealer from the equity derivatives group at another European bank, who spoke to RiskNews on condition of anonymity. The spokeswoman declined to state the size of the losses, but said capital markets net profits would lie between €15 and €30 million for H2. The bank made an overall net profit of €90 million in the first half.
While the structured equities departments of most banks have faced a torrid trading environment in the past few months, Natexis admitted that its risk management processes had failed to effectively manage its exposures. “The difficulties are exacerbated by the inability of certain valuation models to successfully manage the current extreme volatility,” the bank said in a statement. “Certain anomalies in the data fed into the models have also been detected.”
The spokeswoman said Natexis's management was aware that some of its models used in equity derivatives valuation were “old”. But she added that the extreme volatility in the equity markets during July and August caught bank staff by surprise.
A number of dealers have expressed concern that newer entrants in the structured equity products market are failing to manage their risks correctly. Products with embedded cliquets – derivatives equivalent to a series of forward-starting, at-the-money options – are especially difficult to risk manage. This is because a fair valuation requires the correct pricing of the elusive forward volatility smile – the variation of an option’s volatility with strike price and maturity. “Mis-pricings are difficult to prove, but we definitely see competitors with prices that seem inconsistent to us,” Lionel Crassier, Paris-based head of exotic trading in the equity derivatives group at BNP Paribas, told Risk in July.
Natexis said it only uncovered the losses two days ago, and that its internal investigation had taken the most corrective action required to resolve the matter.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts