The UK Pensions Regulator has warned companies they should not continue paying shareholder dividends at the expense of their pension schemes.
UK defined-benefit pension schemes have fallen heavily into deficit in recent months as a result of the economic crisis. The value of fund assets - especially equities - has plummeted, while liabilities have increased as a result of falling government bond yields, used as a discount rate for calculating liabilities by regulators. At the end of January, according to the Pension Protection Fund, the 7,800 defined-benefit funds it tracks were collectively £190.6 billion in deficit, compared with a deficit of £48.8 billion a year ago.
The Pensions Regulator acknowledged the downturn would make it more difficult for companies to act to repair deficits, but warned pensioners should not be pushed to the back of the queue. "There is no reason why a pension scheme deficit should push an otherwise viable employer into insolvency. But the pension recovery plan should not suffer, for example, in order to enable companies to continue paying dividends to shareholders," the regulator said today.
However, the regulator would not oppose companies who wanted to delay their deficit recovery plans until the economy improved. "Pension schemes are long-term undertakings and the challenges presented by current economic circumstances should be seen within this longer-term context. Where there are short-term concerns over affordability - and where trustees and the employer agree to reschedule the deficit recovery plan to maintain the long-term health of the employer - a back-end loaded plan might be more appropriate than extending the plan length," it added.
Pension obligations played a part in the bankruptcy of Canadian telecommunications company Nortel on January 14, and are forecast to have the same effect on others - leading governments in both Canada and the US to loosen deficit rules to give struggling companies more time to repair their pension funds.
More on Insurance
Group led by Andrew Haldane opens debate on effects of insurance regulation
Regulators cannot always be as tough or as lenient as they would like
Change to definition of unit-linked expenses would increase firms' SCR
Insurers are maintaining their interest in emerging market debt
Sign up for Risk.net email alerts
Nominated for two technology awards
Nominated for post trade technology award
Sponsored webinar: Collateral and counterparty tracking
Isda directors warn on fragmentation, access and liquidity - but expect problems to pass
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.