Germany’s DZ Bank takes €100 million-plus swaps hit
DZ Bank, the largest central co-operative bank in Germany, has made significant trading losses from its zero-coupon interest rate swaps positions.
The bank will book trading losses of €40 million due to its interest rate swaps positions for 2002, and will write down exceptional losses expected at more than €100 million in last year’s account, also associated with the swaps.
The losses are related to zero-coupon swaps entered into by DG Bank in 1997, before the bank merged with GZ Bank in 2001. When DG Bank upgraded its trading and risk systems in 1999 to a service provided by Summit Systems, a unit of UK systems provider Mysis, swaps data was incorrectly keyed into Summit. This created a mismatch between the bank’s active and passive swaps positions.
In effect, DZ Bank has posted artificially inflated profits for the past four years with regard to its trading book. Once one of these zero-coupon swaps reached maturity a few weeks ago, DZ Bank’s internal controls identified the error. Zero-coupon swaps are off-market swaps, where either or both the counterparties makes only one payment at maturity. This means they can effectively lie dormant in the trading book until maturity triggers payment.
A DZ Bank spokesman said an internal investigation was ongoing at the bank, but to date there was no indication of malicious behaviour or any problems associated with Summit technology.
DZ Bank acts as a ‘central bank’ to around 1,350 co-operative banks in Germany that typically cater to about 15% of the retail and small to medium-sized enterprise segment of the market.
Stefan Best, a bank analyst at credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s (S&P) in Frankfurt, said the losses were unlikely to affect DZ Bank’s A-/A2 rating with outlook negative. S&P takes the robustness of the entire co-operative banking system into consideration when assessing DZ Bank’s credit rating.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes sole remaining China G-Sib not to have released TLAC plans
Industry pushes to extend review for Emir active accounts rule
Fears that compressed timeframe leaves less than a year to test if controversial policy is working
Banks will not be frowned upon for discount window borrowing – Fed official
Risk Live: more banks have completed paperwork to access Fed lending facility than a year ago
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
- Filling gaps in market data with optimal transport