FSA clamps down on remuneration packages
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) today said that bank employees were given incentives to pursue risky policies to the detriment of shareholders, and ultimately taxpayers.
The compensation packages received by high-level executives, irrespective of performance, have come under scrutiny in the past year, not only in the media but also by the likes of the European Commission and the Financial Stability Forum.
Increased supervision of remuneration schemes was also one of the preconditions of the UK government’s £50 billion recapitalisation of British banks. Upon unveiling the plan on October 8, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown warned banks that: “Where there is irresponsible or excessive risk taking, we have to take action”.
The guidelines drawn out by the FSA focus on four areas: performance evaluation, composition of remuneration, deferred compensation, and oversight. Performance should be judged by profits and not revenues, with reference to other business goals where appropriate. There should be a measure of risk-adjusted return, likely to be based upon economic capital calculation. Meanwhile, as well as financial performance, criteria such as risk management skills should be borne in mind when awarding bonuses.
In order to align the interests of the employee and the firm, remuneration should be a mixture of cash and equity, with a significant proportion of bonuses paid out on a deferred basis to reflect an individual’s long-term performance.
When finalising the compensation packages of senior management, firms should appoint a board level remuneration committee, which should include a majority of non-executive directors.
In its statement, the FSA urges firms that are currently looking at remuneration processes for year-end reviews to align their policies with these guidelines. Nevertheless, the FSA stresses it is not its intention to set remuneration levels for banks, but to ensure policies are harmonised with sound risk management practices.
See also: Bankers' incentives blamed for crisis
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion