EU presses ahead with tougher regulation of rating agencies
The European Parliament today voted in favour of a new regulation that will force credit rating agencies (CRAs) to comply with minimum standards of good practice and transparency.
The regulation was adopted with 569 votes in favour, 47 votes against and four abstentions. Members of the European Parliament noted that CRAs had failed to adapt to the risks posed by the credit markets and to detect the worsening of financial market conditions in due time.
Under the new rules, CRAs operating in the European Union will need to register with the Committee of European Securities Regulators, which will be responsible for their day-to-day supervision.
Registered CRAs will be required to ensure ratings are not affected by conflicts of interest and to remain vigilant on the quality of the rating methodology. They will not be allowed to rate financial instruments without sufficient prior information; they must disclose their models, methodologies and assumptions and produce an annual transparency report; and they will have to create an internal function to review the quality of their ratings.
"We expect the conduct of the CRAs to be significantly improved as a result of this regulation, with clear benefits to the integrity and stability of the financial markets," said EU internal market and services commissioner Charlie McCreevy.
The new laws will become legally binding by 2010 and will affect any CRA operating in the EU, including the European subsidiaries of Standard & Poor's and Moody's.
See also: Banks suffer from stricter ratings criteriaOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision