In a report published today, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) highlighted disclosure, concentration and the role of ratings agencies as key features of the credit risk transfer market that may need to be addressed with regulation.The BIS’s report on credit risk transfer – written by Committee on the Global Financial System working group – echoes concerns raised last year by the Bank of England and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that a lack of transparency may allow dangerous concentrations of credit risk to develop.
The working group said that its findings on the lack of disclosure about credit risk transfer among banks and insurers may give “grounds for concern”, and that disclosure was “all the more important” when considering credit default swaps because of possible leverage effects.
The BIS described the vanilla default swap broker-dealer market as continuing to be “highly concentrated”, according to information gathered from several sources, including Risk magazine’s annual credit derivatives surveys. While saying a downturn in the creditworthiness of large intermediaries had the potential to disrupt markets, the BIS concluded that the concentrations of liquidity may simply be a consequence of the market’s infancy. And even relatively developed derivatives markets such as foreign exchange and interest rates are dominated by just a few banks.
The BIS also said ratings agencies had “in effect become standard setters for the tranching of portfolio credit risk,” but that “there are nonetheless questions about how ratings can provide a consistent measure of risk.”
Concerns about ratings agencies’ methodologies have recently surfaced among investors in bespoke credit products - typically single tranche deals where the remainder of the capital structure is not issued. Some investors claim that dealers are involved in systematic ratings arbitrage (Risk January 2003, page 42).
Quoted in the January 2003 issue of Risk, Andrew Jackson, London-based senior director in the credit products group at Fitch Ratings said: “In the past, there has clearly been some ratings arbitrage. But compared with one year ago, we are now much wiser to this possibility.”
More on Structured Products
Risk comparisons must be made easier under Priips KID, says AMF
JAC calls on regulators to co-ordinate cost disclosure rules in KID with Mifid II
Capital-at-risk product comes with an unusually long 10-year maturity
Issuer’s capital-at-risk product with quarterly coupons reviewed
Sign up for Risk.net email alerts
Sponsored video: MarketAxess
Sponsored video: Tradeweb
Multifonds talks to Custody Risk on being nominated for the Post-Trade Technology Vendor of the Year at the Custody Risk Awards 2014
Sponsored webinar: IBM Risk Analytics
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.