Banks and CCPs clash over non-default losses
Clearing house members have balked at being on the hook for catastrophic losses from investments or cyber attacks that threaten the solvency of a CCP – but clearers say they should share the load. Both agree further guidance is needed from regulators
Nobody wants to be the last person at the table when it's time to settle the bill. Yet that's the position banks and their clients could find themselves in if a central counterparty (CCP) were to suffer significant losses – even if nobody has defaulted.
CCPs and their members acknowledge that non-default losses (NDLs) – those incurred by the clearing house unrelated to member defaults – are a risk
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
JSCC considers default fund consolidation
Japanese clearing house looks for efficiency gains amid expansion of clearing products and influx of international firms
EU clearing houses pressured to diversify cloud vendors
CROs and regulators see tech concentration risk as a barrier to operational resilience
Why better climate data doesn’t always mean better decision-making
Risk Benchmarking research finds model and systems integration challenges almost as limiting to effective climate risk management
CanDeal looks to simplify third-party risk management
Six-bank vendor due diligence utility seeks international reach
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Italy’s spread problem is not (always) a credit story
Occasional doubts over Italy’s role in the monetary union adds political risk premium, argues economist
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
AI spend in US could be good for bonds in Europe – finance chiefs
Development of AI is capital-intensive, but adoption less so, which could favour EU
