A matter of trust

Faced with distrust in the market and suspicion from regulators, the three major credit rating agencies have proposed changing their methodologies for collateralised debt obligations. But will that be enough to placate supervisors and investors? By Alexander Campbell

johnmooren-jpg

Rating agencies have taken a thrashing since July last year, when the first of the residential mortgage-backed security (RMBS) and collateralised debt obligation (CDO) tranches with exposure to US subprime mortgage loans were downgraded. Since then, the agencies have come under heavy fire from investors over the accuracy of their ratings and for not reacting fast enough to evidence of a rise in subprime delinquencies as early as 2006. The saga has also reawakened concern about potential

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here