Post-trade processing is a complex and expensive operational overhead for the majority of financial services firms. Processing remains manually intensive and new derivative products created in the front office leave the middle and back office fighting fires to settle transactions, rather than delivering value to the organisation.
Where firms have attempted to automate processes, they have so far tended to do so in isolation - for example by instrument type or legal entity - creating operational silos and failing to cover the full lifecycle of the contract. With increased instrument complexity, fluctuating volumes and confirmation backlogs continuing to rise, the buy-side clearly needs to consolidate and centralise middle and backoffice activities across asset classes for confirmation, risk management, pricing, valuation and settlement.
Alongside the market pressures, regulatory scrutiny will also force firms to change for the better.
With the US Federal Reserve mandating that 75 per cent of OTC Derivatives confirmations must
now be electronic, delivering efficiency across post-trade processing is no longer a strategic option; it's now a pre-requisite to conducting compliant business.
There is a significant challenge in breaking down silos that have built up over years of operations to bring about the changes that are required. But by taking a more strategic view of operations, the technology and the processes used to support it, firms can remove many of the barriers to greater automation.
This paper will examine the ongoing challenges in post-trade processing, the technology and process foundations needed to deliver automation, and the benefits that centralised, multi-asset class automation can deliver.
More on Infrastructure
US regulatory concerns about liquidity of government securities collateral could be resolved by access to the Fed’s discount window, CCP officials say
High-frequency traders have been viewed with suspicion for some time. Now critics claim exchanges are conspiring with the traders to develop tools that benefit them and disadvantage ordinary investo...
The benefits of local trade repositories outweigh the possible disadvantages of multiple reporting requirements, says executive director of HKMA’s financial infrastructure unit
Sign up for Risk.net email alerts
Sponsored webinar: IBM Risk Analytics
Nominated for two technology awards
Nominated for post trade technology award
Sponsored webinar: Collateral and counterparty tracking
There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.