Banks fear outcome as Basel Committee wraps up RWA review

Regulators have spent much of the past year trying to work out why risk-weighted asset numbers are so varied. With the results due soon, bank participants say the study should paint a kinder picture than other recent analyses, but they fear the policy changes that may follow. By Michael Watt

risk-cover-story-pic-0113

In the next few months, regulators will emerge, oily and dishevelled, from a year spent under the bonnet of the bank capital system. They are trying to find out whether huge bank-to-bank differences in risk-weighted assets (RWAs) – the modelled numbers on which capital ratios are based – are legitimate. The stakes are high. Banks have an obvious incentive to play tricks with their RWAs as a way of reducing the impact of Basel III’s tough new capital requirements, and if the market loses faith in

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here