Regulators struggle to tackle pro-cyclicality

Mitigating pro-cyclicality in the regulatory capital framework was one of the principal objectives of Basel III, but serious concerns surround the counter-cyclical capital buffer proposal, while efforts to dampen cyclicality in minimum requirements appear to have stalled. How much progress have regulators actually made? Joel Clark reports

simon-hills-bba-0809

Of the various components that make up the Basel III reform package, few have been more complex or challenging than efforts to mitigate pro-cyclicality. With the reforms due to be finalised by the end of the year, few regulators or bankers have the confidence to assert that the approach adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision will genuinely succeed in reducing the cyclicality of the framework.

The stakes couldn't be much higher. In the wake of the crisis, pro-cyclicality was

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here