Macro-prudential supervision: the case against

The financial crisis could have been averted if regulators had been allowed to prick the credit bubble as it was inflating – or so claim advocates of macro-prudential supervision. But not everyone agrees. By Laurie Carver

scales

Friedrich Hayek, the economist and political philosopher, called it “the fatal conceit” – the idea that it is possible to direct participants in complex systems, like markets, as though they were a multitude of puppets in the hands of a master puppeteer. Supervisors and central bankers are bent on proving him wrong.

The wires they will use to manipulate the system are prudential measures, such as bank capital, liquidity and leverage standards, plus collateral requirements and loan-to-value

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here