SEC to set up specialised detection units
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will set up five specialised units to detect financial criminals more efficiently, following criticisms its examiners are not equipped to deal with complex financial cases.
Earlier this year, the regulator was accused of institutional incompetence after failing to expose the $50 billion Bernard Madoff Ponzi scam despite repeated tip-offs. In February, the US Congress House Committee on Financial Services was told by fraud examiner Harry Markopolos that SEC examiners had no expertise in derivatives or quantitative finance and were therefore unable to uncover complex fraud.
“Many questioned the effectiveness of the division in light of the revelations surrounding Bernard Madoff and his egregious conduct,” Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC's division of enforcement, said in a speech before the New York City Bar on August 5. “We listened to the criticism and used it as a learning opportunity. We did what a responsible public agency must do – we used the episode as a catalyst to undertake a vigorous self-assessment of how we do our job.”
The result of the exercise will be five specialised units dedicated to complex areas of securities law. The asset management unit will handle cases involving investment companies, hedge funds and private equity funds; the market abuse unit will focus on large-scale market abuses and complex manipulation schemes; while the structures and new products unit will scrutinise issues related to complex derivatives and financial products. There will also be a foreign corrupt practices unit, and a municipal securities and public pensions unit.
These new units will be staffed by existing personnel in the enforcement division who will receive specialised training, as well as by individuals with practical market experience from other SEC divisions and the private sector.
An SEC official declined to say when the new units would start work.
In addition, the SEC will set up an office of market intelligence to analyse and cross-reference complaints and identify where resources ought to be focused. The division also announced a number of initiatives designed to incentivise individuals to co-operate in SEC investigations. These include a public policy statement for individuals, assurance for witnesses in appropriate cases that charges will not be filed against them and the possibility of deferred prosecution agreements in certain circumstances, which would see the SEC agree to forgo enforcement action in exchange for full co-operation.
However, Khuzami insists this does not mean wrongdoers will be let off lightly. “While I believe in giving credit for co-operation that results in tangible benefits for the investors and the enforcement programme, I don’t believe in being lenient for the sake of leniency, or for rewarding persons for simply complying with routine or expected requests,” he said.
The division also plans to reduce delays in decision-making and disciplinary action by streamlining its internal processes. As part of this effort, a chief operating officer will be appointed to oversee project management.
“These are challenging times at the division of enforcement, but they are also times of great opportunity. We are aggressively pursuing long-term improvements in our structure and processes, while at the same time working hard to continue our enforcement efforts,” Khuzami remarked.
See also: SEC incompetence and secrecy over Madoff enrages Congress
Congress questions SEC competence as Madoff investigation begins
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
Most read
- Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
- For a growing number of banks, synthetics are the real deal
- Did Fed’s stress capital buffer blunt CCAR?