Desperately seeking solutions
If any name or entity epitomises the recent credit crunch, it is Northern Rock. But the UK lender will also be synonymous with a wider upheaval in the banking system. Due to the UK lender's funding struggles, regulators are proposing a number of new liquidity and supervisory rules for banks.
Whether they are acting in haste is yet to be determined. If the Financial Services Authority (FSA), Bank of England and Treasury are given more powers to regulate banks' activities and take action when banks run into serious trouble, this could well avert another Northern Rock debacle. But as one commentator writes in this month's Mortgage Risk, the risk of moral hazard is heightened when more rules are introduced. David Lascelles, of independent thinktank Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation, explains that the more regulations imposed, the more the responsibility shifts away from lenders, and on to the enforcers of rules. Should a bank not be responsible for its own business decisions, and held solely accountable if those decisions (whether it be a novel funding model or lending policy) fail?
At the moment, it may seem banks need all the help they can get, and that some should not be trusted to look after their own affairs independent of the regulator. But the fact is, risks are inherent in every business model. A swathe of new rules, especially if they are hastily assembled to silence the critics, could be detrimental to the industry.
At the time of going to press, the government's detailed rescue plan for Northern Rock had also been announced. To help speed through a private sector bail-out of the lender, the government has proposed that its mounting funding debts be repackaged into government-guaranteed bonds and sold to the capital markets. As interested buyers have until February 4 to submit their revised takeover proposals, Northern Rock could soon know who its new parent is. As you read this, the bank could even have been temporarily nationalised - pleasing many taxpayers.
Some may question why the fate of one medium-sized lender is that important, given the wider turmoil still occurring in the market. But the bond proposal to save Northern Rock has more significance than many may think. As one securitisation expert points out in this edition of this magazine, if the government is prepared to guarantee these bonds, will that not give Northern Rock an advantage in the funding markets?
The securitisation sector is desperately searching for solutions that will reopen the market. Perhaps the government needs to offer its support here too, and not just to one lender.
Dippy Singh, managing editor.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure