GAO urges curbs on 'tying'
The General Accounting Office has recommended that bank regulators take additional measures to adequately enforce laws against the tying of commercial credit to more lucrative investment banking business, despite a lack of hard evidence to support accusations that the practice may be widespread.
House Financial Services Committee chairman Michael Oxley, says: “The GAO found little evidence of widespread tying practices at commercial banks with their investment banking affiliates, but the study underscores the importance of continued vigilance.”
According to the GAO report, regulators have so far focused their enquiries on interviews with the banks and transaction-specific reviews, and have failed to include more broad-based transaction testing and interviews with corporate borrowers.
The GAO recommends that “banking regulators may have to obtain other forms of indirect evidence to assess whether banks unlawfully tie products and services.”
The report also shows that many corporate borrowers are confused by the anti-tying regulations, and that banks’ interpretations of the law and its exceptions can occasionally contain substantial variations. And although the Federal Reserve recently issued a new draft interpretation for public comment, the GAO has suggested that additional guidance on the laws is needed.
Congressman Dingell, the report’s sponsor, agrees. In a letter to the Fed’s Alan Greenspan, he wrote: “The interpretation is overly complex...and I continue to see many pitfalls for the wary and unwary alike…The tone of the document appears to be tilted toward a ‘wink and nod’ approach to non-compliance.”US Credit
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit