Op Risk database reveals fraud costs
Fraud is a far greater operational risk than banks have been prepared to admit, according to data compiled by Aon, the insurance company.
The database covers 12,000 risk events at 2,000 financial firms dating back 10 years, and throws up some sharp contrasts with the quantitative impact studies carried out by the Bank for International Settlements, which has been assessing the effect on banks of its proposals for a new Accord on regulatory capital – Basel II.
In particular, banks seem to have been reluctant to disclose details of frauds they have suffered, even privately, to each other.
The third and most recent Basel quantitative impact study – QIS3 – concluded that 98% of losses through fraud were for sums less than $1 million. But Aon says the mean size of bank fraud is $3.5 million. And that’s after stripping outlying mega-frauds, such as Nick Leeson’s and John Rusnak’s.
The reason for the different results, says Aon, is that banks don’t like reporting frauds if they don’t have to, and they certainly like to keep reports of their frauds away from the press, especially larger internal frauds. The average size of internal frauds reported by banks in QIS3 was $300,000, and $68,000 for external frauds. The Aon database finds the average to be $3 million and $1 million respectively.
The new AonOpbase will compete for attention with other op risk databases, such as those on offer from rating agency Fitch and systems and software vendor SAS. There are also some bank consortia projects, such as the Operational Risk Exchange (ORX) and the British Bankers’ Association database.
Under the Basel II regime, effective from January 1, 2007, banks will be encouraged to source external data on op risks before insuring themselves against risks or set aside appropriate levels of capital.
Aon aims to help financial firms understand how insurance prices respond to the cost of losses, says Jonathan Humphries, associate director at Aon Professional Risks in London. “You can’t expect the insurance industry to insure everything that can be classed as op risk,” he adds. “Individual banks can put the right controls in place once they fully understand the risk.”Risk
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy
EU banks fear loss of NSFR repo relief
European Commission must decide by next June; other jurisdictions adopted softer calibration
Running the numbers on Barr’s Basel III endgame revisions
Fed vice-chair’s plan to ease capital requirements for big banks still lacks critical details
Endgame manoeuvre: US banks put SLR reform back in spotlight
Plan to ease Basel III brings renewed focus to impact of leverage ratio on US Treasury market
Regulators want to fix AT1s. Investors want restraint
Tweaking the instrument that regulators love to hate may be the only way to prevent its abolition
More disclosure touted to temper pre-hedging ills
Transparency could help investors choose a dealer, but will they use the disclosures?
Fed’s Basel III rollback gives clearing units a capital break
Client-cleared trades will be exempt from CVA charges and G-Sib surcharge calculations, says Barr