Cebs publishes guidelines on liquidity buffers
Financial institutions must hold substantial buffers of liquid assets such as cash to enable them to get through a period of at least one month of liquidity stress, according to new guidelines published by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cebs).
In September 2008, Cebs published its advice to the European Commission on sound liquidity risk management, including 30 recommendations. The latest paper, Consultation Paper on Liquidity Buffers & Survival Periods, follows up on recommendation 16, which called on banks to build up buffers of cash and other liquid assets to enable them to survive future stresses without having to adjust their business models.
The paper suggests banks should apply three types of stress scenarios to determine the size of the buffer: idiosyncratic, assuming a loss of confidence in a bank equivalent to a multi-notch downgrade; market-specific, assuming the simultaneous unavailability of several funding markets with concern about the decline in the value of financial assets; and a combination of the two.
Banks are also urged to ensure the buffer is composed of sufficiently liquid assets that will be immediately available in times of stress. "The buffer should be composed mainly of cash and the most reliably liquid assets, even in stressed circumstances, which banks can sell or repo regardless of their own condition (short of a complete loss of confidence) without accepting large 'fire sale' discounts, which would further erode the market's confidence in them," the paper argues.
Lastly, the paper stresses the need to ensure liquid assets are held in the appropriate place and not constrained by any legal, regulatory or operational impediments that would make it difficult to access them when needed.
Cebs opened a consultation period on its guidelines on July 7, running until October 31. It intends to hold a public hearing with interested parties on September 22 in London.
The consultation comes as the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) is working on new liquidity requirements, set to come into force on a phased basis from the start of 2010. The FSA rules will cover a number of areas, including the holding of liquid assets and much more stringent regulatory reporting of liquidity positions.
See also: Agencies aim to unite US with Basel liquidity risk standards
Reporting riddle
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises