ECB no longer accepts syndicated loans as collateral
The European Central Bank (ECB) has removed syndicated loans governed by English law from its list of collateral eligible for its credit operations only four days after they were originally accepted.
On October 15, the ECB widened the framework of eligible collateral in an effort to facilitate access to its credit lines and boost liquidity among European banks. The Bank of England specifically excluded syndicated-loans in the range of collateral it would accept on its own credit schemes earlier last month.
Euro-dominated syndicated loans and various debt instruments would qualify under the new guidelines, while the ECB also enhanced its longer-term refinancing operations to help banks in an increasingly hostile credit environment.
However, the ECB ceased to accept syndicated loans as collateral for its credit lines on November 21, having only started to admit them on November 17. The collateral was originally intended to be eligible until the end of 2009.
The move has puzzled bankers and ratings agencies alike, particularly as the ECB is refusing to comment on why it no longer accepts the loans. One ratings agency analyst speculated the ECB may be concerned that a credit event on the loans would be out of their jurisdiction, which could cause them unnecessary problems.
"It's most mysterious," said one head of global credit strategy at a multinational bank. "You would have thought that somebody was, in their minds, abusing the system, and so they put a stop to it."
"But it could be something perfectly innocent like the ECB realised it would be difficult to price this stuff as syndicated loans never trade," he added.
An ECB official said that the bank believes it currently accepts a sufficient range of collateral to allow banks access to its liquidity schemes, begging the question why it decided to accept syndicated loans in the first place.
See also: Demand wanes for central bank liquidity schemes
Central banks promise unlimited dollar lending
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Most read
- Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one