JP Morgan says downgrade will impact derivatives business
JP Morgan Chase’s credit rating agency downgrades yesterday will affect its derivatives business, the bank told RiskNews at the end of the London trading day today.
Rating agencies Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and Fitch have lowered JP Morgan Chase’s long-term credit rating from AA to AA-. The rating agencies acted after JP Morgan Chase warned that it expects third-quarter earnings to be well below the second quarter. The bank cited a weak trading performance and losses on loans to telecom and cable companies.
In a conference call to credit analysts today, S&P analyst Tanya Azarchs said she was “very disturbed” by the “uncharacteristic” trading performance of JP Morgan Chase. Azarchs said JP Morgan Chase told S&P it had lost money from proprietary trading and that this was “not from one big position but several”. She would not comment on the nature of these deals. JP Morgan Chase offered no comment either.
S&P analysed JP Morgan Chase’s derivatives portfolio and found it had $43 billion of net collateral counterparty exposure. “This is a high number,” said Azarchs. “But the ratings are not altogether disturbing. It tends to be relatively high quality,” she added.
Azarchs warned that if JP Morgan Chase is downgraded again it would have a significant effect on its derivatives trading business. “It would put the bank as a counterparty on derivatives, for example, out of the A range,” she said.
One US bank analyst suggested that S&P was giving JP Morgan Chase “too much slack” by not being tough enough on the firm. But Azarchs replied: “It’s important to keep it in perspective. It is still profitable, and we expect [JP Morgan Chase] to be profitable in every quarter of this year.”
William Harrison, chief executive of JP Morgan Chase, said yesterday he was disappointed with his bank’s results. “As much as we have focused on reducing credit portfolio concentrations in recent years, it is clear that further reductions are necessary, and we will continue to address that issue as an integral part of our credit policies.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Most read
- Podcast: Olivier Daviaud on P&L attribution for options
- SG trader dismissals shine spotlight on intraday limit controls
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one