Westpac suffers 'fat finger' op risk loss in New Zealand
AUCKLAND - A New Zealand couple has absconded with millions of dollars deposited into their account in error by Australian bank Westpac. Leo Gao and Kara Yang-Hurring, who ran a BP service station that had just been put into receivership, fled New Zealand after a Westpac staff member accidentally deposited $NZ10 million into their account following their application for a $NZ10,000 business overdraft. The bank has since recovered about $NZ6 million, but the couple has left the country with the remaining funds. Missing with the pair are Yang-Hurring's daughter Leena, 7, Gao's mother, his business partner Huan Di Zhang and Yang-Hurring's sister Aroha Hurring, according to reports in the New Zealand Herald.
Police tracking the pair have traced them to Hong Kong, Macau and mainland China, largely via their indiscreet updates on Facebook.
Concerned about attention regarding the employee responsible for the loss, who is said to be extremely distressed by the error, Westpac appealed for privacy. TVNZ reported that the employee, who has more than 30 years of banking experience, is undergoing counselling. A Westpac spokesperson told TVNZ: "What should be remembered is the loss from this episode did not happen because of the error, but because of the behaviour of individuals who have taken advantage of the error."
However, it could be said that the real cause of this problem is that the controls system allowed the mistake to occur in the first place. The bank's systems should have incorporated a 'good sense' check or added a further check when a service station owner asked to withdraw and/or transfer millions of dollars. Any internal investigation will focus on the employee's actions but much more so on the multiple failures in the bank's core systems.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion